Re: [atlas] Need host with very large ping times

2017-05-29 Thread Marat Khalili
Dear Borja, Thank you for your offer, but I already found out what I wanted for fixed source IP address and several seconds delays (that firewalls are ok with it). For "real" research much more would need to be done, but I don't have enough time and resources for it now. Just in case someone

[atlas] TLS tests with login.live.com

2017-05-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
TLS tests from the Atlas probes work for me, for every server... *but* login.live.com, for which I always get timeouts (it works with other TLS clients). Measurement #8775150 if someone has an idea...

Re: [atlas] TLS tests with login.live.com

2017-05-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:41:45PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote a message of 5 lines which said: > TLS tests from the Atlas probes work for me, for every server... *but* > login.live.com, for which I always get timeouts (it works with other > TLS clients). Could it be related to this erro

Re: [atlas] TLS tests with login.live.com

2017-05-29 Thread Philip Homburg
On 2017/05/29 13:53 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:41:45PM +0200, > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote > a message of 5 lines which said: > >> TLS tests from the Atlas probes work for me, for every server... *but* >> login.live.com, for which I always get timeouts (it works w

Re: [atlas] TLS tests with login.live.com

2017-05-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:58:13PM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote a message of 24 lines which said: > No, the Atlas code is nowhere near advanced enough to do that. OK, but the coincidence is funny :-) > My guess is that the measurement code sends something the other side > doesn't like and the

Re: [atlas] TLS tests with login.live.com

2017-05-29 Thread Philip Homburg
On 2017/05/29 14:02 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> My guess is that the measurement code sends something the other side >> doesn't like and then the server responds with something the Atlas >> code doesn't understand. > > Any way to debug it in more detail? I guess the first step would be look a