On 2021-12-10 18:31, Randy Bush wrote:
The solution suggested by the Atlas team was simply
to register the new instance with the ID number I
had been using before. This worked.
IIUC, each hardware probe is pre-registered. This
may be an obstacle; I don’t know.
i suspect the probe or actuall
Hi,
On 24/11/2021 12:08, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 15:35, Alun Davies wrote:
We just this morning published an article announcing that, as of today, we are
accepting applications for anyone interested in hosting RIPE Atlas VM anchors.
The article points you to a
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 10:18, Johan ter Beest wrote:
> It is however in our plans to support an IPv6-only option.
>
> The biggest changes needed are in our monitoring, the installation
> process and our deploy as anchor process.
>
> Technically, AFAIK, there are no roadblocks anymore.
>
> We could
Hi,
On 13/12/2021 12:08, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 10:18, Johan ter Beest wrote:
It is however in our plans to support an IPv6-only option.
The biggest changes needed are in our monitoring, the installation
process and our deploy as anchor process.
Technically, AFAIK,
>>> The solution suggested by the Atlas team was simply
>>> to register the new instance with the ID number I
>>> had been using before. This worked.
>>>
>>> IIUC, each hardware probe is pre-registered. This
>>> may be an obstacle; I don’t know.
>>
>> i suspect the probe or actually the back end
