Re: [atlas] VM probes (was Re: Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas)

2015-11-10 Thread Stephan Wolf
Sure, PROBES as an VM in e.g. overloaded environments are a problem. So Probes on a VM = can result in some troubles in the existing Atlas model. To make a "second class" probes I agree that this takes too much efforts. ANCHOR as an VM would really make sense. What do you think about this ?

Re: [atlas] VM probes (was Re: Feature request for IP record route feature in RIPE Atlas)

2015-11-09 Thread Stephan Wolf
How would we manage > these (think of field-upgrades) and how to administer them (at the moment > it's easy, since we supply the whole device with keys and firmware). > > Regards, > Robert > > > On 2015-11-09 13:34, Stephan Wolf wrote: > > +2 for VM probe > >