> It’s way easier for me to spin up 25 virtual probes than 25 physical
> ones :)
it is even easier to spin up 1,000 prngs
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
>> maybe virtual vm probes might be useful
>
> You're not giving up on this, are you?
It’s way easier for me to spin up 25 virtual probes than 25 physical ones :)
Hoping tha
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:37:06PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
> maybe virtual vm probes might be useful
You're not giving up on this, are you?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AGVorstand: Sebastian v. Bomh
Hello,
Some clarifications below.
On 2016-08-25 16:51, Max Mühlbronner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i noticed another problem besides the hardware, the "controllers" are not
> really highly-available? (E.g. ctr-ams07, NL)
They are not individually highly-available, but we have many of them for
redundancy.
Hi,
i noticed another problem besides the hardware, the "controllers" are
not really highly-available? (E.g. ctr-ams07, NL)
Sometimes the probes are disconnected from a RIPE controller for some
time even though there is no absolutely no network issue at the probes
site. I suppose this could
maybe virtual vm probes might be useful to investigate and also a split file
system for v3 probs with /var/log on a different file system ?
Colin
> On 25 Aug 2016, at 15:30, Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We took another, more detailed look at probe lifetimes and the dynamic
Dear colleagues,
We took another, more detailed look at probe lifetimes and the dynamics
of probes connecting and disconnecting from the RIPE Atlas
infrastructure to try to understand how to keep the network growing in
the long term.
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/wilhelm/another-look-at-ripe-atl
