Daniel,
My own feeling is that the appeals process worked basically well enough
the first and only time it has been used, and that we would not be able
to get any significant gain by a redesign at this point.
Since we've only had 1 appeal since the process was actually documented
6+ years ag
Dear colleagues,
RIPE 82 will be held as a virtual meeting and will take place from 17-21
May 2021.
You can now register for free at:
https://ripe82.ripe.net/attend/register/
-
RIPE 82 Conference Platforms
-
We are pleased to inform you that the RIPE 82 Meeting will us
Hi Leo & TF members,
I’ve been reading up on the CoC and the status of it as of today.
In the document, there is no mention of unwanted behaviour / attention that
could be classified as stalking.
Under the section: aggressive communication, there are several examples of what
would be seen as i
> On 12 Apr 2021, at 14:16, Erik Bais wrote:
>
> In the document, there is no mention of unwanted behaviour / attention that
> could be classified as stalking.
IMO, that’s not a bug. It’s a feature. The CoC should just talk about
inappropriate behaviour as a general concept and not attempt t
On 4/10/21 11:13 AM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
I have some implementation ideas already, similar but not identical
to the RIPE NCC arbitration procedure. However before I get to those
I would like to have some feedback on the general idea.
Wearing my arbiter hat, I agree that some of the challe
Dear colleagues,
We're proud to announce the launch of the new RIPE Labs! We're very happy with
the redesign and we hope you'll all agree that the new layout is a big
improvement on the old.
To get a feel for what's changed, our latest article looks back at some of the
great contributions auth
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:31:17AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> Again: Should we go beyond tweaking and fundamentally review the PDP appeals
> procedure?
the problem that lead us here seems to be much deeper than the
appeals part at the far end of the PDP.
One source of confusion is that th
