JJZolx;682195 Wrote:
Since the ReplayGain values are computed for the decoded Vorbis tracks,
they could be different than for their lossless counterparts. I know
that with Mp3 files it's common to have ReplayGain peak values above
1.0 due to the encoding that cuts off high frequencies. I
Since the ReplayGain values are computed for the decoded Vorbis tracks,
they could be different than for their lossless counterparts. I know
that with Mp3 files it's common to have ReplayGain peak values above
1.0 due to the encoding that cuts off high frequencies. I imagine
Vorbis does something
I have an album which I had previously ripped to Ogg Vorbis format. I
am now attempting to rip it to FLAC format but is seems in the
intervening years the CD has become damaged and some tracks won't rip.
I am therefore proposing to keep the Ogg Vorbis files for those tracks
and use FLAC files
Fozzy;681224 Wrote:
I have an album which I had previously ripped to Ogg Vorbis format. I
am now attempting to rip it to FLAC format but is seems in the
intervening years the CD has become damaged and some tracks won't rip.
I am therefore proposing to keep the Ogg Vorbis files for those
I suggest comparing the track gain for a couple of tracks that you can
rip with FLAC and their OGG counterparts. I can't see why there would
be a difference, but it might be worth checking that the RG values are
similar on a track level.
It could then probably make the assumption that the
