That's why I rely on external VU meters, and just apply or remove gain to
get the average level where I want it. I havent' used peak normalisation in
about 4 years.
And Jay: I feel your pain with aspect ratios.
- Original Message -
From: "al davis"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 201
On Friday 16 August 2013, Cowboy wrote:
> On Friday 16 August 2013 11:07:39 am Rob Landry wrote:
> >
> >
> > What is the reason for normalizing to -13dBFS?
>
> 0 db FS in radio leaves 20 db or so headroom.
>
> -13 db FS digital leaves 13.0 db headroom.
>
> 0 digital is clip minus one least
- Original Message -
> From: "Alan Peterson"
> I reviewed the AudioArts Air-1USB broadcast console for Radio World
> about a year ago and was puzzled to see the meters not bouncing around
> in a manner I'm used to seeing. Turns out the USB port was glued down
> to 0VU = -20 dBFS.
Well, f
- Original Message -
> From: "Cowboy"
> On Friday 16 August 2013 11:07:39 am Rob Landry wrote:
> >
> > What is the reason for normalizing to -13dBFS?
>
> 0 db FS in radio leaves 20 db or so headroom.
Terminology is a bitch, ain't it? ;-)
Anything labeled dBFS is *automatically* a digit
Also keep in mind in Rivendell, the audio meters are not dBFS like you would
find in Cool Edit/Adobe Audition in Windows. I think they are a cross-over
between VU and peak these days.
0dB in Rivendell would be equivilent to a -16dBFS sinewave tone on an audio
file in Cool Edit back in Windows,
The long winded version I sent off list before I noticed it's not replying
to the list by default :o)
- Original Message -
From: "Cowboy"
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [RDD] M-Audio Delta 44 +4db Output
On Friday 16 August 2013 11:07:39 am Rob Landry wr
On Friday 16 August 2013 11:07:39 am Rob Landry wrote:
>
> What is the reason for normalizing to -13dBFS?
0 db FS in radio leaves 20 db or so headroom.
-13 db FS digital leaves 13.0 db headroom.
0 digital is clip minus one least significant bit.
--
Cowboy
http://cowboy.cwf1.com
Texas la
I noticed this too, for this email, for example, it defaulted to your
email address instead of the list's.
On 16 August 2013 11:40, Gavin Stephens wrote:
> I haven't posted in a while and just noticed when I click reply it doesn't
> default to the mail list. Has it always been like that? I haven'
I haven't posted in a while and just noticed when I click reply it doesn't
default to the mail list. Has it always been like that? I haven't changed
email client in near a decade.
Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.riv
The Air-1 is a nice looking console. I like the Arrakis Arc-10 series too,
nice and simple like the Air-1. The dBFS reference makes sense though since
the console outputs +24dBu. You wouldn't want a 0dBFS source driving the
console at near +24dBu all the time.
- Original Message -
Fro
What is the reason for normalizing to -13dBFS?
Rob
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Gavin Stephens wrote:
According to the manual, that card can only output +14dBu. So there's 10dB
robbed by not having a proper +24dBu output.
So if you are 'peak' normalising your files to say -13dBFS, the peak output
I'm not done with analog studios yet, either.
Although we have a good station ground, with this 300 ft lighting rod
out back, inevitably about once every year or so we suffer a damaging
strike.
Throw a couple 5532s in the output circuit of our consoles and were back
in business.
Reminds me
On Friday 16 August 2013 08:22:57 am Alan Peterson wrote:
> But coaxing a USB UART chip to give you a hotter level? IDTS.
Appears your choices are :
Professional sound card, along with lower noise.
Cheap sound card, and an amp, with higher noise, at roughly the same cost.
--
Cowboy
http://co
Aren't standards fun?
I reviewed the AudioArts Air-1USB broadcast console for Radio World about a
year ago and was puzzled to see the meters not bouncing around in a manner I'm
used to seeing. Turns out the USB port was glued down to 0VU = -20 dBFS.
I'm not done with analog studios as of yet.
14 matches
Mail list logo