On Mar 26, 2013, at 22:47 47, drew Roberts wrote:
> could the old versions be kept on an ftp server so that they are not a simple
> apt or rpm command away but are still there for the digger?
The old sources (all the way back to 0.9.80) are available at
http://www.rivendellaudio.org/ftpdocs/riv
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 10:47:47 pm drew Roberts wrote:
> could the old versions be kept on an ftp server so that they are not a simple
> apt or rpm command away but are still there for the digger?
Somewhere in a directory named UNSUPPORTED-Archive-only ?
( or something similar )
I'd support
I'd be happy with an RPM that was available somewhere for broadcast
appliance. I never have successfully installed anything from source
I know, I'm a loser and I should learn how to do it, but believe me I
have tried..
anyway, the time for system update, is not when You are trying to
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 19:54:42 Fred Gleason wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:27 07, Nathan Steele wrote:
> > Sure would be nice to be able to install an old version from the repo's,
> > though I can possibly understand why Fred wouldn't want that.
>
> Been there, tried that...
>
> The difficulty
On Mar 26, 2013, at 11:27 07, Nathan Steele wrote:
> Sure would be nice to be able to install an old version from the repo's,
> though I can possibly understand why Fred wouldn't want that.
Been there, tried that...
The difficulty with multiple versions in the same repository is that (naive)
> Few things annoy me as much as an error message that says "file not found"
> when it could just as easily say "file not found: /home/wzzz/somefile".
or worse "an error has occurred" not even "an error has occurred while
trying to whatever", just "an error has occurred"...
Nathaniel C. Steele
As
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Nathan Steele wrote:
> I'm not going to take any offense to this, but I want to point out that I
> had the same problem trying to upgrade a broadcast appliance install to a
> version that was not the current one for a station I do some contract work
> for. I never solved it.
and don't get me started on Microsoft updates.they have a habit of
breaking more than they fix.
Nathaniel C. Steele
Assistant Chief Engineer/Technical Director
WTRM-FM / TheCrossFM
On 3/26/2013 2:01 PM, Cowboy wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 March 2013 11:27:07 am Nathan Steele wrote:
>> FWIW here at
I was referring strictly to the Rivendell updates in this instance, all
other repos are disabled on my Riv machines after the initial install.
so far the Riv updates have included fixes/features I want/need.
Nathaniel C. Steele
Assistant Chief Engineer/Technical Director
WTRM-FM / TheCrossFM
On
On Tuesday 26 March 2013 11:27:07 am Nathan Steele wrote:
> FWIW here at my station I keep the versions current, though I usually
> wait a month or two just in case
And I very much subscribe to "if it ain't broke, don't fix it !"
Unless there's a compelling reason to upgrade, don't !
I kn
I'm not going to take any offense to this, but I want to point out that
I had the same problem trying to upgrade a broadcast appliance install
to a version that was not the current one for a station I do some
contract work for. I never solved it.I didn't want to nor did I have the
time to upgra
On Mar 25, 2013, at 19:46 21, Juan Priario wrote:
> Rivendell 2.4.0, from Rivendell Audio, Qt vers 4.8.
You need Qt 3.x. 4.x is a totally different animal; the two are not source
(let alone binary) compatible. See 'INSTALL' in the top of the Rivendell
source tree for a list of required depend
Rivendell 2.4.0, from Rivendell Audio, Qt vers 4.8.
2013/3/25 Sharkie <4721...@gmail.com>
> What version are you trying to compile?
> Where did you get the source from?
>
>
> ___
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
> h
What version are you trying to compile?
Where did you get the source from?
___
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
On Monday 25 March 2013 07:40:14 pm Juan Priario wrote:
> So my question to see if someone else the same thing happened.
> Dependecy error is obvious but I have qt installed on my system.
This has been known to happen if the QT version installed
is not the version ( and/or location ) the build s
I explain that it is the first time that happens to me and I have not been
able to solve it in this version of openSUSE, and I installed rivendell before
reaching version 1 when the was Salems Radio Lab
So my question to see if someone else the same thing happened.
Dependecy error is obvious but I
No offense, but if you can't fix a library dependency maybe you shouldn't be
trying to build from source.
I recommend you try the paravel appliance instead http://www.paravelsystems.com/
~larry
On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Juan Priario
mailto:jpstud...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Once started the ins
Once started the installation process to run ./configure --libexecdir =/srv
/rd-bin I get the error "checking for Qt ... no
configure: error: *** Qt toolkit not found, unable to continue *** "
OpenSUSE 12.3 and my system can not find the library in the repo, some help
to solve this problem?
Thanks.
18 matches
Mail list logo
