Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Gregg Wonderly
On Sep 17, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Wayne Merricks wrote: > Hi, > > My understanding is probably completely wrong on this so I'm not > surprised at the "won't somebody think of the children" response. I > honestly don't know enough about the linux "domain" stack to have a > better judgement but s

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Cowboy
> On 17/09/12 16:34, Wayne Merricks wrote: > > Hi, > > > > but seeing as he mentioned there were 2 Windows boxes, > > it seemed like the obvious/only way to go (samba). Missed that the first time around. You are quite correct. If the environment includes anything Microsoft, then Samba becomes

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Cowboy
On Monday 17 September 2012 01:56:37 pm Test Mailbox wrote: > I'd be happy to look at any web sites that might have example > initializing profile scripts Cowboy mentioned if he can provide links to > the sites. Off-hand, I can't. Like many, what I know has been learned over many years, as re

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread VE4PER/ Andy
Thanks Wayne, This is a help for me for the windows boxes for sure. Like you I will have to continue to seek info on the linux equivalent as it were. I use the same user ID for both windows and linux boxes so setting up a linux equivalent and then getting samba and linux to play nice together

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Test Mailbox
On 17/09/12 16:34, Wayne Merricks wrote: > Hi, > > My understanding is probably completely wrong on this so I'm not > surprised at the "won't somebody think of the children" response. I > honestly don't know enough about the linux "domain" stack to have a > better judgement but seeing as he mention

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Wayne Merricks
Hi, My understanding is probably completely wrong on this so I'm not surprised at the "won't somebody think of the children" response. I honestly don't know enough about the linux "domain" stack to have a better judgement but seeing as he mentioned there were 2 Windows boxes, it seemed like th

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Cowboy
On Monday 17 September 2012 08:11:48 am Wayne Merricks wrote: > Depends how in depth you want to go but seeing as you don't really want > to be setting up new users manually, Samba as a domain controller is the > way to go. Oh, Lord no !! Why do bad windows hacks, necessary to force windows t

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Cowboy
On Monday 17 September 2012 05:59:50 am VE4PER/ Andy wrote: > It is to get around having to configure desktops, email accounts and > program preferences over and over each time a new install is done with > the same user. > > In the case of RD, a new user could log on to a machine and customize

Re: [RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread Wayne Merricks
Hi, Depends how in depth you want to go but seeing as you don't really want to be setting up new users manually, Samba as a domain controller is the way to go. https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/samba-dc.html It will handle Windows domains and can also serve linux. I must admit Linux

[RDD] RD networking machines

2012-09-17 Thread VE4PER/ Andy
I would like to set up a server with network shares that are effectively /home/user1, /home/user2, /home/rduser etc so that I effectively have roaming linux user profiles. Before I change system config files I thought I would run it by the list here to see if there are any pitfalls to avoid: p