Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Aaron Batty
I guess a big issue I have is simply the wording: Preview. It's not a preview. It's the actual view. It's more like a dynamic view than a preview. "Preview" implies something lower-quality and temporary, when actually it's the higher-quality output. The "Submit" could simply be renamed "Save to ou

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi! On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:44:25 +0100 d_jan wrote: > > while we're still at brainstorming, I'll toss in a further thought > > in this category: Turn the "Preview"-checkbox itself into a > > tri-state control, e.g. a drop-down menu "Preview disabled", > > "Docked Preview", "Separate window".[…] >

Re: new handling of previews in rkwarddev

2016-01-30 Thread meik michalke
Am Freitag, 29. Januar 2016, 18:05:01 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > two small related issues: > > 1. [...] I'd suggest to simply assign an id by default, > as is done for many other elements, including even rows/columns. done. > 2. [...] Always specifying the label, explicitly, will work aro

very XiMpLe XML validation

2016-01-30 Thread meik michalke
hi, to whom it may concern: the XiMpLe package is driving all of the XML related stuff in rkwarddev. until now, it wasn't possible to describe valid structures of XML trees with the package, to check XiMpLe objects. this is currently all done by each rkwarddev XML function on its own. i wanted

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread d_jan
Hi, > while we're still at brainstorming, I'll toss in a further thought > in this category: Turn the "Preview"-checkbox itself into a tri-state > control, e.g. a drop-down menu "Preview disabled", "Docked Preview", > "Separate window".[…] What I know as a sort of standard from dockable windows i

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:29:23 +0100 meik michalke wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2016, 10:25:12 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > > 1) Having the preview docked directly to the plugin window. (Size > > is an issue, here, but could probably be solved by moving the > > preview area to the side,

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread meik michalke
hi, Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2016, 10:25:12 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > 1) Having the preview docked directly to the plugin window. (Size is an > issue, here, but could probably be solved by moving the preview area to > the side, instead of bottom of the dialog.) > 2) Having an easy way to cre

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:05:36 +0900 Aaron Batty wrote: > It would indeed be cool if the preview were just in the window, > although sizing concerns seem valid. > > I just finished my stats class this semester (need to grade finals > today). It was our first time using the Preview window as th