hi again ;-)
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016, 22:34:30 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 23:29:25 +0100 meik michalke duesseldorf.de> wrote:
> > yet another train ride... thomas suggested something similar to this
> > way back, and now it's possible: XiMpLe just gained a new meth
hi,
Am Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016, 22:16:54 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> sounds useful. Is there any start of creating such validity rules for
> RKWard plugin .xml files?
not yet, but that'll come.
> (This also sounds a lot like DTD's. While not specifically useful to
> RKWard, I guess the a
Hi,
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 23:29:25 +0100
meik michalke wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2016, 17:11:59 schrieb meik michalke:
> > in the develop branch, XiMpLe has a new object class
> > XiMpLe.validity, a new constructor function XMLValidity() for
> > objects of that class, and a new method validXM
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:11:59 +0100
meik michalke wrote:
> the XiMpLe package is driving all of the XML related stuff in
> rkwarddev. until now, it wasn't possible to describe valid structures
> of XML trees with the package, to check XiMpLe objects. this is
> currently all done by each rkward
