Undocking (plot) preview (was: Re: Preview - Input needed?)

2016-02-03 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, not the most important question about docked previews, IMO, but to get back to "undocking": Essentially you can already do this (in the work/preview_with_menu branch), by using Device->Duplicate, i.e. first option in the menu. This is not strictly undocking, but it can be used to turn a previ

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-03 Thread meik michalke
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 19:31:17 schrieb Aaron Batty: > > actually it was once called "Install dependencies", until somebody > > pointed out that this is not what the option is doing. The > > corresponding parameter in install.packages() is called "dependencies", > > but dependencies=TRUE mea

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-03 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:31:17 +0900 Aaron Batty wrote: > > actually it was once called "Install dependencies", until somebody > > pointed out that this is not what the option is doing. The > > corresponding parameter in install.packages() is called > > "dependencies", but dependencies=TRUE mean

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-03 Thread Aaron Batty
> > actually it was once called "Install dependencies", until somebody > pointed out that this is not what the option is doing. The > corresponding parameter in install.packages() is called "dependencies", > but dependencies=TRUE means installing both hard dependencies _and_ > suggested packages, w

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-03 Thread meik michalke
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 12:34:13 schrieb Aaron Batty: > Sorry. YES. > > It works perfectly now: great, now in ftp://upload.kde.org/incoming/: RKWard-binary-0.6.4-1_OSX10.9_KDE-4.14.3_needs_CRAN_R-3.2.3.pkg: sha1sum f8b2546cfaf3433c3e5b2ad3fc17e66c5f73e83c sha256sum 747d3513e65c4b986f2f

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-03 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:34:13 +0900 Aaron Batty wrote: > BTW, two things I just noticed. Instead of "Install suggested > packages," shouldn't that say "Install dependencies?" I actually > never used to click that because I didn't know what it did. If it had > said "dependencies," I would have.

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-02 Thread Aaron Batty
Sorry. YES. It works perfectly now: > R version 3.2.3 (2015-12-10) -- "Wooden Christmas-Tree" > > Copyright (C) 2015 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing > > Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0 (64-bit) > > > R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > > You are welcome to

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-02 Thread meik michalke
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 09:59:50 schrieb Aaron Batty: > Thanks. does this mean the bundle works? :: m. -- dipl. psych. meik michalke institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie heinrich-heine-universit"at d-40204 d"usseldorf signatu

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-02 Thread Aaron Batty
Thanks. I should have looked at the actual address to see that the CRAN server wasn't related. Oops. The reason I had initially suspected that, though, was that when I was having the ANOVA problem, a lot of people just couldn't use the HTTPS versions. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:06 PM, meik michalk

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-02 Thread meik michalke
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:30:09 schrieb meik michalke: > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:09:55 schrieb Aaron Batty: > > Warning: unable to access index for repository > > http://files.kde.org/rkward/R/bin/macosx/mavericks/contrib/3.2: > > damn, i needed to set a symlink on the server, shoul

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-02 Thread meik michalke
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:09:55 schrieb Aaron Batty: > Warning: unable to access index for repository > http://files.kde.org/rkward/R/bin/macosx/mavericks/contrib/3.2: damn, i needed to set a symlink on the server, should work now! i need to think about whether this is a permanent solution

Re: RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-01 Thread Aaron Batty
Can't really test because I get this error when asked to select a mirror: Warning: unable to access index for repository http://files.kde.org/rkward/R/bin/macosx/mavericks/contrib/3.2: cannot open URL ' http://files.kde.org/rkward/R/bin/macosx/mavericks/contrib/3.2/PACKAGES' I've tried the Tokyo

RKWard 0.6.4-1 for OS X [was: Preview - Input needed?]

2016-02-01 Thread meik michalke
hi, Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, 15:09:35 schrieb meik michalke: > Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, 10:40:28 schrieb Aaron Batty: > > Meik: Are you going to build that 0.6.4-1, or am I? > > don't worry, i'm on it! :: m. here's a new bundle: https://files.kde.org/rkward/testing/bundles/MacOSX/RKWar

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-31 Thread meik michalke
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, 10:40:28 schrieb Aaron Batty: > Meik: Are you going to build that 0.6.4-1, or am I? don't worry, i'm on it! :: m. -- dipl. psych. meik michalke institut f"ur experimentelle psychologie abt. f"ur diagnostik und differentielle psychologie heinrich-heine-univers

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Aaron Batty
I guess a big issue I have is simply the wording: Preview. It's not a preview. It's the actual view. It's more like a dynamic view than a preview. "Preview" implies something lower-quality and temporary, when actually it's the higher-quality output. The "Submit" could simply be renamed "Save to ou

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi! On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:44:25 +0100 d_jan wrote: > > while we're still at brainstorming, I'll toss in a further thought > > in this category: Turn the "Preview"-checkbox itself into a > > tri-state control, e.g. a drop-down menu "Preview disabled", > > "Docked Preview", "Separate window".[…] >

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread d_jan
Hi, > while we're still at brainstorming, I'll toss in a further thought > in this category: Turn the "Preview"-checkbox itself into a tri-state > control, e.g. a drop-down menu "Preview disabled", "Docked Preview", > "Separate window".[…] What I know as a sort of standard from dockable windows i

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 12:29:23 +0100 meik michalke wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2016, 10:25:12 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > > 1) Having the preview docked directly to the plugin window. (Size > > is an issue, here, but could probably be solved by moving the > > preview area to the side,

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread meik michalke
hi, Am Samstag, 30. Januar 2016, 10:25:12 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > 1) Having the preview docked directly to the plugin window. (Size is an > issue, here, but could probably be solved by moving the preview area to > the side, instead of bottom of the dialog.) > 2) Having an easy way to cre

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:05:36 +0900 Aaron Batty wrote: > It would indeed be cool if the preview were just in the window, > although sizing concerns seem valid. > > I just finished my stats class this semester (need to grade finals > today). It was our first time using the Preview window as th

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-29 Thread Aaron Batty
It would indeed be cool if the preview were just in the window, although sizing concerns seem valid. I just finished my stats class this semester (need to grade finals today). It was our first time using the Preview window as the main graphics output (it didn't work on Macs with the version we use

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-29 Thread d_jan
> Can you think of any use-case where this would _not_ be desirable? Did just a brief check so far; the interface seems to be fine :) I'll keep my eyes open for edgecases though. Jan Am 29.01.2016 um 12:03 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > Hi once more, > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:13:47 +

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-29 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:46:18 +0100 meik michalke wrote: > Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, 10:21:46 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > > well, I am mostly "done" with the preview feature, and arrived at a > > solution that I am quite happy with, so far. > > now that i've played around with the p

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-29 Thread meik michalke
Am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016, 10:21:46 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier: > well, I am mostly "done" with the preview feature, and arrived at a > solution that I am quite happy with, so far. now that i've played around with the power plugin i must say that this preview thing totally rocks \o/ i wou

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-29 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi once more, On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:13:47 + (UTC) Jan Wort wrote: > I lost a bit track of the UI for the preview. To get into the loop > again: Is there any input needed from me currently? ok one more thing to look at for you an everybody else: In an effort to reduce height of dialog with p

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-26 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:22:56 + (UTC) Jan Wort wrote: > > Now that the import plugins have a preview, should "Open imported > > data for editing" still be the default? > > It would show that the action was actually done (and successfully so) > so I'd suggest to continue using this behavio

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-26 Thread Jan Wort
Hello, > Now that the import plugins have a preview, should "Open imported > data for editing" still be the default? It would show that the action was actually done (and successfully so) so I'd suggest to continue using this behaviour. (Just tried it myself, accidentally with a large table, w

Re: Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-26 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi Jan, hi everybody else, On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:13:47 + (UTC) Jan Wort wrote: > I lost a bit track of the UI for the preview. To get into the loop > again: Is there any input needed from me currently? well, I am mostly "done" with the preview feature, and arrived at a solution that I am qu

Preview - Input needed?

2016-01-25 Thread Jan Wort
Hello RKWard Devs, I lost a bit track of the UI for the preview. To get into the loop again: Is there any input needed from me currently? On a related note: I updated quick mockup to be able to share an interface mockup to codepen, so no more saving/attachment mailing needed in case you want t