hi,
am Donnerstag 11 August 2011 (18:22) schrieb meik michalke:
> well, i'll try to write at least the paste() based function in the
> meantime ;-)
done. i uploaded a new file to rkward/rbackend/rpackages/rkward/R, called
"rk.write.about.R".
it contains four functions
- rk.write.about() # the
hi,
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2011, 17:58:43 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> hm, I don't like the thought of having a duplicate structure, if we can
> reasonably avoid it. If users start to mix editing by hand and editing via
> a function, this will lead to inconsistencies.
yeah, i don't find
Hi,
On Thursday 11 August 2011, meik michalke wrote:
> yes, for the writing part paste()ing it together should be easy. in case we
> want to go the other direction and read/parse the XML tree, reliably
> writing that ourselves would be a little more demanding.
>
> it would be helpful to have an u
hi,
Am Donnerstag, 11. August 2011, 09:29:20 schrieb Thomas Friedrichsmeier:
> On Thursday 11 August 2011, meik michalke wrote:
> > yes, that was exactly where i was going. it would also be nice to have a
> > simple dialog for that, where you could type in some basic info.
>
> True. And that dial
On Thursday 11 August 2011, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote:
> True. And that dialog itself could be implemented as a plugin, I think.
Actually, one thing that is missing, before this can be implemented as a
plugin, cleanly, is a facility to define "sets" of options, e.g. to allow
specification of
On Thursday 11 August 2011, meik michalke wrote:
> > You mention producing this info by a script, and I think it would really
> > be a good idea to have something roughly equivalent to
> > package.skeleton() for rkward plugins, indeed.
>
> yes, that was exactly where i was going. it would also be
