Hi,
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 20:56:01 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
> old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
> The checks look fine.
>
> I'm going to e-mail the maintainers of reverse dependencies and leave
OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
The checks look fine.
I'm going to e-mail the maintainers of reverse dependencies and leave
them some time to reply before pushing to CRAN. Anything I may have
missed?
