On Wednesday 27 August 2014 14:54:51 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> If Thomas agrees, I'll keep them as they are and send the message to the
> maintainers.
Absolutely. Go ahead!
Regards
Thomas
--
Slashdot TV.
Video for
hi,
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2014, 09:56:14 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> Honestly, I'm not sure I like it. It would look like
> # Getter: OK
> HTMLFile()
> # Setter: weird
> HTMLFile() <- "/my/path"
>
> What do you both think about it? I think R is pretty inconsistent
> already, with par(cex=3)
Le mercredi 27 août 2014 à 08:42 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 26 August 2014 20:56:01 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
> > old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
> > The checks l
Hi,
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 20:56:01 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
> old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
> The checks look fine.
>
> I'm going to e-mail the maintainers of reverse dependencies and leave
OK, I think we are good now. I've added accessors for the
old .HTML.file, and this works at least with my package which uses it.
The checks look fine.
I'm going to e-mail the maintainers of reverse dependencies and leave
them some time to reply before pushing to CRAN. Anything I may have
missed?
Le dimanche 24 août 2014 à 16:29 +0200, meik michalke a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, 24. August 2014, 12:35:16 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> > Breaking the API because of a silly WARNING does not seem like the best
> > option to me.
>
> i totally agree. but when it comes to keeping something on CRAN, ev
Am Sonntag, 24. August 2014, 12:35:16 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> Breaking the API because of a silly WARNING does not seem like the best
> option to me.
i totally agree. but when it comes to keeping something on CRAN, even a silly
WARNING can shut the door. i really admire the quality managem
Le dimanche 24 août 2014 à 15:29 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 24 August 2014 12:35:16 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > > I'm uncertain, whether we should
> > > a) use S3-method markup, anyway
> > > b) rename HTML.cormat to HTMLcormat, breaking the API (although of cour
Hi,
On Sunday 24 August 2014 12:35:16 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > I'm uncertain, whether we should
> > a) use S3-method markup, anyway
> > b) rename HTML.cormat to HTMLcormat, breaking the API (although of course
> > we could keep a deprecated HTML.cormat along with a))
> > c) Ignore the note,
Le dimanche 24 août 2014 à 11:46 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Sunday 24 August 2014 10:20:56 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > Actually I also need a setter function in my RcmdrPlugin.temis package,
> > so I'll add both a getter an a setter. The NEWS will have to mention
> > t
Hi!
On Sunday 24 August 2014 10:20:56 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Actually I also need a setter function in my RcmdrPlugin.temis package,
> so I'll add both a getter an a setter. The NEWS will have to mention
> that this update breaks API anyway.
While we're at breaking the API: I've taken care
Le dimanche 24 août 2014 à 08:27 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> On Saturday 23 August 2014 23:21:37 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > Great! I've created a GitHub repository at
> > https://github.com/nalimilan/R2HTML
> >
> > Please apply for commit rights (or give me your username) and I'l
On Saturday 23 August 2014 23:21:37 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Great! I've created a GitHub repository at
> https://github.com/nalimilan/R2HTML
>
> Please apply for commit rights (or give me your username) and I'll give them
> to you.
Username is tfry-git (both tfry and tfried were already take
Le jeudi 21 août 2014 à 15:23 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Wednesday 20 August 2014 23:14:59 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> > If fixing all of R2HTML would take too much time, we could as well
> > remove the offending functions, as it's always better for users than not
> > be
Hi!
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 23:14:59 Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> If fixing all of R2HTML would take too much time, we could as well
> remove the offending functions, as it's always better for users than not
> being able to install the package from CRAN at all.
>
> If you are OK, I can volunt
Le mercredi 20 août 2014 à 17:23 +0200, Thomas Friedrichsmeier a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Wednesday 20 August 2014 14:56:02 meik michalke wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 13:57:06 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> > > If nobody steps in to take up
> > >
> > > maintainership, it will eventually
Hi!
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 14:56:02 meik michalke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 13:57:06 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> > If nobody steps in to take up
> >
> > maintainership, it will eventually be archived. As RKWard uses R2HTML
> > for output, it would be quite a bad situation.
>
hi,
Am Mittwoch, 20. August 2014, 13:57:06 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> If nobody steps in to take up
> maintainership, it will eventually be archived. As RKWard uses R2HTML
> for output, it would be quite a bad situation.
indeed.
> Would you be interested in working at fixing the few R CMD c
Hi!
I have received this e-mail from CRAN maintainers some time ago as one
of my package depends on R2HTML. If nobody steps in to take up
maintainership, it will eventually be archived. As RKWard uses R2HTML
for output, it would be quite a bad situation. Would you be interested
in working at fixin
19 matches
Mail list logo
