Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread Christi Alice Scarborough
David Bryant wrote: > > I started WavPack 4.0 essentially from scratch, and designed it from the > ground up to be hardware friendly. While I would never release a winamp > plugin or Audition filter that could not handle a pre-4.0 file, handling > them in embedded applications is optional (as is h

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread David Bryant
I generally *am* concerned about backwards compatibility, but the older WavPack formats were not really designed for embedded decoding. Hell, when WavPack 1.0 was released, a desktop PC couldn't even decode them in realtime! I started WavPack 4.0 essentially from scratch, and designed it from the

Check out these voices man

2006-02-10 Thread Rocker
hi folks, >From what I read these voices may be too complex for rockbox but check out the quality. Especially the French. Freaking Awesome...rocker http://www.acapela-group.com

Re: H120: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread Manuel Dejonghe
On 2/10/06, gl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a great supporter of Dave Bryant's Wavpack (lossless in particular) and > just wrote a Wavpack plugin for Steinberg's Wavelab: > http://wavpack.gl.tter.org. I'm hoping to add WP recording to RB once I get > used to the source. > > Anyway, with the cu

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread Linus Nielsen Feltzing
Thom Johansen wrote: Yes, for recording most rates should work, as the clock is generated externally. Can see no reason for why 24 bit digital in shouldn't work, but I'm no expert. The Coldfire audio bus is 20-bit only... Linus

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread Thom Johansen
gl wrote: I'll check with him. He likes to stay backwards compatible. In the meantime, those files should be refused. Some seem to be, but others try to play regardless and cause the problem. Sure he is, but it might also be that pre-4.0 files require other/more resources which would make

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread gl
Then small wonder, our decoder (a modified version of the tiny decoder from wavpack.com) does not support pre-4.0 files. You'll have to ask David Bryant about how possible it is to support these files. I'll check with him. He likes to stay backwards compatible. In the meantime, those file

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread Thom Johansen
gl wrote: Correction, it seems _older_ (probably 3.98) .wv files don't play correctly - my newer ones do work. I'll need to check the details... -- gl Then small wonder, our decoder (a modified version of the tiny decoder from wavpack.com) does not support pre-4.0 files. You'll have to as

Re: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread gl
Correction, it seems _older_ (probably 3.98) .wv files don't play correctly - my newer ones do work. I'll need to check the details... -- gl - Original Message - From: "gl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: H120: Hi & Wavpack broken? Hi gu

H120: Hi & Wavpack broken?

2006-02-10 Thread gl
Hi guys, great work you've done on this thing! So great in fact that two days after reading about what RockBox can do, I'm holding a H140 in my hand :). OK, amongst other things I'm a musician and programmer. My primary interests in RockBox are Wavpack playback and recording, enabling 20bi