No. In any case, I have credited you for this fix.
"Bug found by an anonymous person.".
LOL
Thanks for the insult.
Sorry man, I just find it funny the way that the knife is twisted at
each opportunity, and then surprise (or such) is suggested when the
offendee rebuts.
BC
--
gl
Some people would have chosen to focus on the positive aspect of gl's email.
I hope the choice to edit out all the help was a _deliberate_ (not
accidental) attempt to perpetuate a non-existant negative state, Tomas.
In answer to the question (see "?") that was misread as a "complaint"
Two blok
(warning, OffTopic)
> Please. Not again.
my appologies for letting myself go, I had decided not to respond to a
single of these mails but obviously the Belgian beer didn't do me good
yesterday.
won't happen again (the letting go, not the beer)
I'd like to respectfully request that the admins set up a separate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list for these kind of long and pointless
flame wars.
bk
gl: If you want real credit for your work give a name, otherwise give it a rest.>My problem is that Linus on the one hand rejects my patches because, I quote>"we do not want to work with anonymous people", but then happily accepts and
>commits my fixes _without credit_! And then rubs my face in it
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, gl wrote:
My problem is that
Please. Not again.
--
Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/
What the hell is your complaint. You *clearly* stated that you've been
long
enough in the business that you don't need the credits to prove yourself
(and blow up your ego), yet the moment you don't get 'named' credit you
complain.
Jesus christ, does anybody in this group *not* knee-jerk into
> > No. In any case, I have credited you for this fix.
>
> "Bug found by an anonymous person.". Thanks for the insult.
As you requested. No seriously.
What the hell is your complaint. You *clearly* stated that you've been long
enough in the business that you don't need the credits to prove your
> > No. In any case, I have credited you for this fix.
>
> "Bug found by an anonymous person.". Thanks for the insult.
I think this was rather meant as a friendly wink from Linus.
Personally, I much appreciate your findings, keep going! \o/
Jörg
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
No. In any case, I have credited you for this fix.
"Bug found by an anonymous person.". Thanks for the insult.
--
gl
gl wrote:
(does it seem bizarre to anyone that I can report bugs but not get
credit for them?)
No. In any case, I have credited you for this fix.
screen_access.c, lines 156-157:
screen->puts_scroll_style=&lcd_puts_scroll_offset;
screen->puts_scroll_offset=&lcd_puts_scroll_style;
Note assi
gl wrote:
> (does it seem bizarre to anyone that I can report bugs but not get
> credit for them?)
Please man... get over it... or at least keep the complaints for
yourself ok?
Tomas
(does it seem bizarre to anyone that I can report bugs but not get credit
for them?)
screen_access.c, lines 156-157:
screen->puts_scroll_style=&lcd_puts_scroll_offset;
screen->puts_scroll_offset=&lcd_puts_scroll_style;
Note assignments are the wrong 'way round (that's why my scrolled lines w
(but you have to register with them).
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/default.mspx
--
gl
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the link
http://download.rockbox.org/daily/source/rockbox-daily-20060404.tar.gz
should point to
http://www.rockbox.org/daily/source/rockbox-daily-20060404.tar.gz
Thanks for telling!
Actually, this link is now pointing to:
http
Hi, devs,
in
http://www.rockbox.org/daily.shtml
under latest source
the link
http://download.rockbox.org/daily/source/rockbox-daily-20060404.tar.gz
should point to
http://www.rockbox.org/daily/source/rockbox-daily-20060404.tar.gz
Joerch
(this is a user comment for a 3.0 iRiver release, I haven't studied the
button code so I have no specific recomendations to make).
On my H140, I find the button use for traversing the options menu
irritating. For one, I think the play button (a seperate button on the
H1x0's from the joystic
I know this is not a blocker for the release, and no one in the dev team seems
to be using this, but this 10-lines patch brings a useful feature, and a lot of
people have been using it for months...
Could we please get it in 3.0?
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/2598
fred
18 matches
Mail list logo
