On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Thomas
Martitz wrote:
> Rafaël Carré schrieb:
>>
>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:28:06 -0700
>> Mike Giacomelli wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2) "Unstable" - all targets with working playback that developers
>>> feel are usable but unstable. This classification would be informal,
IMHO, the Clip could be elevated to a 'pseudo-unstable' status,
possibly supporting only low-bitrate files? I've had very few issues
with those personally.
Emphasis on the 'humble' bit there, I'm really not a dev
Hilton
A selected quote: Claims of humanitarian concerns are merely a fig
leaf ove
Rafaël Carré schrieb:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:28:06 -0700
Mike Giacomelli wrote:
2) "Unstable" - all targets with working playback that developers
feel are usable but unstable. This classification would be informal,
having been agreed on by the individual ports developers that a
target is r
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:28:06 -0700
Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> 2) "Unstable" - all targets with working playback that developers
> feel are usable but unstable. This classification would be informal,
> having been agreed on by the individual ports developers that a
> target is ready for people othe
2009/9/2 Mike Giacomelli :
>
> Hi all.
>
> I remember over devcon there was some discussion that our system of
> unsupported and supported builds, and the parallel system or released and
> unreleased ports for our quarterly releases doesn't work as well as we would
> like. Personally, I think a
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:28:06PM -0700, Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> Or at least something to this effect. Thoughts?
I agree with most (or all, with some wording things) of what you said,
and I propose not to quibble about wording issues, or we'll get nowhere
yet again. We can fix wording later,
Hi all.
I remember over devcon there was some discussion that our system of unsupported
and supported builds, and the parallel system or released and unreleased ports
for our quarterly releases doesn't work as well as we would like. Personally,
I think allowing advanced but still incomplete p
Hey friends,
Within a week or two, we (the Haxx team) intend to move all services that is
Rockbox-related from the current server that hosts www.rockbox.org over to the
server that already runs svn.rockbox.org.
It means that mailing lists, web site(s), daily builds and various cron jobs
etc
Hi all.
Tomorrow thursday I will be taking down the subversion server (svn.rockbox.org)
for hardware upgrades.
Estimated downtime is 08:00 - 09:00 CET.
--
Björn
