Re: Release

2014-06-18 Thread Tom Cole
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:13:58 +0200, Marcin Bukat marcin.bu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi rockboxers! There have been long time since we did 3.13. We are in the state where first thing we advice when someone pops up with problem is to install development build. Moreover there are quarrels among devs

Re: Release

2014-06-18 Thread Tom Cole
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 23:20:03 +0200, Frank Gevaerts fr...@gevaerts.be wrote: On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 08:51:53AM +1200, Tom Cole wrote: There should be a push to complete any unstable ports that are almost finished, such as the fuse+. You mean there *shouldn't* be a release soon There are a few

Rockbox Front Page

2007-09-01 Thread Tom Cole
Just pointing out to the dev's that the Recent SVN Activity section on the site page http://www.rockbox.org/ is not updating.

Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines - Host Changed

2007-01-09 Thread Tom Cole
I have moved the description and hosting of Rockbox-2.5.1 to the unsupported builds forum. Details here http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=3075.0

Re: Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines Updated

2007-01-06 Thread Tom Cole
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:17:23 -0500, Neon John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:43:53 +1300, Tom Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:57:31 -0500, Neon John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Now if you'd just give me a one-key keyboard lock Say, a long push of F3

Re: Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines Updated

2007-01-06 Thread Tom Cole
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 03:03:16 -0800, Zakk Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry john, by order of management, updates are prohibited! This is utterly ridiculous. You started with a supported build plus a bug fix. That's easy to support and simple enough to be allowed on the wiki (the wiki, being

Re: Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines Updated

2007-01-06 Thread Tom Cole
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:22:11 -0600, Paul Louden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Notice my VERY first post regarding this issue in which I said: I may be missiong something, but it seems that if continued development is going to happen on this unofficial build, rather than it being a single static

Re: Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines Updated

2007-01-05 Thread Tom Cole
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:36:48 -0600, Paul Louden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nobody has suggested that it be erased. The only suggestion has been that it follow the same rules as every other unsupported build, and maybe change to a less confusing name. It was an exception early on, but several things

Re: Rockbox 2.5.1 for Archos Machines Updated

2007-01-05 Thread Tom Cole
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 06:57:31 -0500, Neon John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Now if you'd just give me a one-key keyboard lock Say, a long push of F3 or something like that. John Sorry john, by order of management, updates are prohibited! Just the two key F1+Down for now, pressed and

Re: rockbox-recorder-20061122 - volume representation messed up

2006-11-23 Thread Tom Cole
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:09:30 -, gl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's where the 92% came from as the Archos can go up to +12dB (100%). I see (never had one). Sure, but 100% for 0dB and (say) 110% convey it just as well. I don't think this is intuitive at all if it is not clear that 100%

Re: rockbox-recorder-20061122 - volume representation messed up

2006-11-23 Thread Tom Cole
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:18:49 -0800, Menachem Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BH On 11/23/06, Tom Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps it's enough to add dB on the display to make it clear? Yes, that's a good idea either way. Yes I agree, but on the small Archos screens

Archos special build

2006-02-23 Thread Tom Cole
I am trying to find a host web site for my special build of Rockbox 2.5 for Archos, with enhanced Recent Bookmarks - display and voice. This would make it more widely available and give me feedback on its usefulness to the Rockbox community. Would the developers mind if I created a wiki page on