Nils wrote:
If you are interested in my patches I will post them somewhere for you.
Please do. We have a patch tracker for exactly this purpose.
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/index.php?type=4
Linus
On 9/25/07, Linus Nielsen Feltzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do. We have a patch tracker for exactly this purpose.
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/index.php?type=4
Linus
And here is the tracker task :-)
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/7832
Nils wrote:
And here is the tracker task :-)
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/7832
Thanks a lot. Now please remind me, what was the benefit of using 4.2.1
again?
Linus
On 25 Sep 2007, Tapio Kelloniemi spake thusly:
Someone said (when talking about computers) that a fear of hassle is wisdom. I
use a Linux from Scratch system, and therefore compile everything from the
sources myself. I like bleeding edge, once compiled by system with CVS
versions of Glibc and
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
I've been trying to build Rockbox for H300 and X5 using Gcc 4.2.1 and
binutils 2.18. As you may expect, I have not succeeded, and I have a few
question.
You forgot to tell us _why_ you did this and didn't just install the
recommended versions?
Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
I've been trying to build Rockbox for H300 and X5 using Gcc 4.2.1 and binutils
2.18. As you may expect, I have not succeeded, and I have a few question.
I think you're better off with binutils 2.16.1. I used that when I
tested GCC 4.2.0 a while ago.
My first
