Andrew Hart wrote:
Of course, the idea isn't to wait for the beep and go around a second
time; the aim is to get close to it on the first pass. The beep is to
let you know you've muffed it and also gives you a guide for the second
attempt which can be made simply by keeping the button
snip
Incidentally, searching for a particular subdirectory/file buried in a
directory somewhere is much easier on the iriver H1xx/3xx players with
the LCD remote since one of the buttons allows you to skip through the
list a bunch of tracks at a time.
Could you please tell me how this is
alex wallis wrote:
snip
Incidentally, searching for a particular subdirectory/file buried in a
directory somewhere is much easier on the iriver H1xx/3xx players with
the LCD remote since one of the buttons allows you to skip through the
list a bunch of tracks at a time.
Could you
Usecase:
I am using rockbox with voice files i have each file with a voice tag, I
want to get to a song beginning with S. Lets say we have 1000 songs, I
can scroll and then stop periodically to listen to my current location
(slow). I will know when i am near or far away from the song i want.
We
anticlockwise so why is it
preferable to spend time scrolling clockwise to get to the end of the
list beep, when you could scroll one item anticlockwise and be there? I
fail to understand how comfort factors in, since either way you're at
the end of the list and must scroll anticlockwise.
to
the beep, you then still *have* to scroll anticlockwise so why is it
preferable to spend time scrolling clockwise to get to the end of the
list beep, when you could scroll one item anticlockwise and be there?
I fail to understand how comfort factors in, since either way you're
at the end
Thomas Martitiz wrote:
You're not always at the very beginning of a list. Rockbox remembers
the selection, which makes scrolling just 1 item up impossible then.
This is true if you back out of a folder. So now we're in a situation
where someone is backing out of a sub-list, and wants to
Am 15.06.2009 01:07, schrieb Paul Louden:
No matter who's doing the talking, nobody can say this is the best
solution to the problem without first defining the scope of the
problem. Since the only problem described seems to be getting to the
bottom of the list there are much faster ways to
then still *have* to scroll anticlockwise so why is it
preferable to spend time scrolling clockwise to get to the end of the
list beep, when you could scroll one item anticlockwise and be there? I
fail to understand how comfort factors in, since either way you're at
the end of the list and must
then still *have* to scroll anticlockwise so why is it
preferable to spend time scrolling clockwise to get to the end of the
list beep, when you could scroll one item anticlockwise and be there? I
fail to understand how comfort factors in, since either way you're at
the end of the list and must
Apologies for the double post. Thunderbird gave me the impression the
post didn't go out as it was still sitting in the drafts folder. I
should have been more patient and checked the sent folder instead. In
any case, I want to make a further comment below.
Andrew Hart wrote:
Having a
11 matches
Mail list logo
