>
> Am 06.07.2012 23:53, schrieb Mike Giacomelli:
> > We can leave the actual logf code in git, and just convert the stuff
> > that makes sense over to the new system.
>
> Any log to disk would trigger Jonas' storage-related problems. I guess
> he asks if a read-only build would be possible.
>
On 08.07.2012 19:08, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 06.07.2012 23:53, schrieb Mike Giacomelli:
>> We can leave the actual logf code in git, and just convert the stuff
>> that makes sense over to the new system.
>
> Any log to disk would trigger Jonas' storage-related problems. I guess
> he asks if a r
Am 06.07.2012 23:53, schrieb Mike Giacomelli:
We can leave the actual logf code in git, and just convert the stuff
that makes sense over to the new system.
Any log to disk would trigger Jonas' storage-related problems. I guess
he asks if a read-only build would be possible.
Best regards.
Hi Mike,
On 6-7-2012 12:30, Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> Hi Everyone.
>
> I've implemented a new logging system for rockbox to eventually
> replace DEBUGF and LOGF. The new system is very similar to the old,
> but with 2 significant improvements:
>
> 1) It uses the register_storage_idle_func to wr
We can leave the actual logf code in git, and just convert the stuff
that makes sense over to the new system.
Mike Giacomelli schrieb:
>Can this be turned off? I am hunting issues which relate to disk access,
>and I get freezes upon writing / reading in some cases.
Turning this off would result in the system we currently have. If you
want that system, just use LOGF directly and ignore my patch.
What
>Can this be turned off? I am hunting issues which relate to disk access,
>and I get freezes upon writing / reading in some cases.
Turning this off would result in the system we currently have. If you
want that system, just use LOGF directly and ignore my patch.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:43:24AM +0200, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
> Related to your gerrit, can one see the whole diff of all patchsets
> together in gerrit somehow?
Yes, indirectly. In the list of patch sets, next to each patch set
there's a gitweb link. If you click on that, you get to the gitweb
On 06.07.2012 09:43, Jonas Wielicki wrote:
>
Okay, my mail might've been to critic, I like the work, a good logging
system might be really helpful. Just asking some questions back cause
I'm curious :)
cheers
On 06.07.2012 00:30, Mike Giacomelli wrote:
> 1) It uses the register_storage_idle_func to write log files to disk
> during spin up. This is similar to how config files and battery bench
> logs are handled. Thus, there is no loss of battery life from
> logging.
Can this be turned off? I am hunti
Hi Everyone.
I've implemented a new logging system for rockbox to eventually
replace DEBUGF and LOGF. The new system is very similar to the old,
but with 2 significant improvements:
1) It uses the register_storage_idle_func to write log files to disk
during spin up. This is similar to how conf
11 matches
Mail list logo