Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-23 Thread Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Amaury Pouly amaury.po...@gmail.com wrote: The driver rewrite making them working with 0.1dB steps is not related to the equaliser. I suggest you start a dedicated discussion on this particular issue. My concern is with anything in Rockbox that makes users deal

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-23 Thread Amaury Pouly
2013/7/23 Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien guilla...@cocatre.net On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Amaury Pouly amaury.po...@gmail.com wrote: The driver rewrite making them working with 0.1dB steps is not related to the equaliser. I suggest you start a dedicated discussion on this particular

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-23 Thread Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Amaury Pouly amaury.po...@gmail.com wrote: Or maybe open a bug report. Ever since I noticed this issue, I've been dealing with administration-like hell, being told to setup gerrit and submit a patch (for which I had to setup an OpenID account and register with

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-22 Thread Amaury Pouly
I would like to see some discussion (and eventually, an authoritative decision or consensus) regarding the recent increase in resolution of volume and equalizer handling, from 0.5dB to 0.1dB. I highly doubt that a 0.1dB difference is at all audible. Moreover, it will probably do absolutely

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-21 Thread Guillaume Cocatre-Zilgien
Hello, I would like to see some discussion (and eventually, an authoritative decision or consensus) regarding the recent increase in resolution of volume and equalizer handling, from 0.5dB to 0.1dB. I highly doubt that a 0.1dB difference is at all audible. Moreover, it will probably do

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-21 Thread Bertrik Sikken
On 19-7-2013 11:35, Amaury Pouly wrote: Hi all, I would like to bring back some thought on the volume handling and the radio. 1) Handling of steps With the recent rework of jhMikes, the internal representation of the volume changed: now the hardware drivers also work in tenth dB

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-21 Thread Bertrik Sikken
On 19-7-2013 11:35, Amaury Pouly wrote: Hi all, I would like to bring back some thought on the volume handling and the radio. ... 2) Handling of radio volume This is nothing new but very annoying: some targets have limited amplifying range when routing from radio. It appears that for some

Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-19 Thread Amaury Pouly
Hi all, I would like to bring back some thought on the volume handling and the radio. 1) Handling of steps With the recent rework of jhMikes, the internal representation of the volume changed: now the hardware drivers also work in tenth dB representation and this has the nasty side effect that

Re: Volume handling: steps and radio

2013-07-19 Thread Marcin Bukat
1) Handling of steps With the recent rework of jhMikes, the internal representation of the volume changed: now the hardware drivers also work in tenth dB representation and this has the nasty side effect that not all values are valid. Consider the following example (Fuze+):