Zakk Roberts wrote:
It's saying that this ought to be fixed,
nobody's arguing that, so let's get it out of the way of the real
bugs, and if it does happen to show up later, we can open a new one.
I agree. It's not that we close them as fixed. We close them as
Out-of-date because of lack of
well, we do want to be sure there's no actual bug there.
what's against closing old tasks that have no response for some time
(like 3+ or 6+ month) and also don't have any valid reporter (like old
ones that were imported from sf or anonymous ones)? If we can't
reproduce that bug anymore such a
On 16/07/06, Dominik Riebeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, we do want to be sure there's no actual bug there.
what's against closing old tasks that have no response for some time
(like 3+ or 6+ month) and also don't have any valid reporter (like old
ones that were imported from sf or
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
hey,
i was having a quick look through the bug reports and especially the
old ones have had no comments for 3+ months except asking weather the
bug still exsists.
How long do we wait for an answer before closing the reports?
Don't forget that Rockbox has been in
