On Sun, Nov 09, 2008, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote:
> About the Jz47xx targets: currently the SD code is not working,
> meaning it's probably going to change; so you probably don't want to
> base your defines on the current code.
I noticed it used a mix of MMC/SD code, so I preferred not to touch it
-
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 22:09, Rafaël Carré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2008, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:17:14AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Date: 2008-11-09 07:17:14 +0100 (Sun, 09 Nov 2008)
> > > New Revision: 19043
> > >
> > > Log Message:
>
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:17:14AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Date: 2008-11-09 07:17:14 +0100 (Sun, 09 Nov 2008)
> > New Revision: 19043
> >
> > Log Message:
> > SD PP: move non specific defines to sd.h, to be reused by other SD drivers
>
> G
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:17:14AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: 2008-11-09 07:17:14 +0100 (Sun, 09 Nov 2008)
> New Revision: 19043
>
> Log Message:
> SD PP: move non specific defines to sd.h, to be reused by other SD drivers
Good idea, but since sd.h is (inderectly) included in not dir
