bumping in the hope of some feedback...
On 04/06/06, Jonathan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
new version..
few stupid bugs gone so it now actually works!
compiles and runs fine without ROCKBOX_HAS_LOGF (although these need
to be taken out of the source code where its used.)
ive cheater with
new version..
few stupid bugs gone so it now actually works!
compiles and runs fine without ROCKBOX_HAS_LOGF (although these need
to be taken out of the source code where its used.)
ive cheater with the log viewer by just dumping it to disk then
opening the file with viewer.rock, but i have coded
i.e., .rockbox/syslog.log wasn't created and
even when I touch'ed it, it didn't fill with contents.
Note: using the 'dump logf' menu option did cause a HDD reaction.
Ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan G
ause a HDD reaction.
Ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gordon
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 3:53 PM
To: Rockbox development
Subject: logf enhancements
hey,
last week i got the idea of getting logf used in the standard build in
MAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 4:25 PM
To: Rockbox development
Subject: Re: logf enhancements
I appreciate the hard work you've done and look forward to the incorporation
of your patch.
However, you indicate that you haven&
I appreciate the hard work you've done and look forward to the
incorporation of your patch.
However, you indicate that you haven't completed testing yet ("the
patch [...] might not compile without that"; assurance that the patch
won't break compiles wold be reassuring.
Also, it would be eas
hey,
last week i got the idea of getting logf used in the standard build in
the hope that it could be used to trace some of the painful bugs (i.e
wierd playback issues), so iv started work on making logf a bit
nicer,,,
so ive attached a patch with the my work so far hopefully to get some
feedback.
