olton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rockbox development"
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: make file help please
I suggest you install Linux (Debian is really easy) and use that. I started
off using cygwin and found it painfully slow (on my PIII 600) but after
ins
On 3/3/06, Martin Arver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ubuntu is also very easy to install
> and is functional straight out of the box. If your curious, you could
> always download the live-cd and try it out.
Ubuntu cd's (a pack of a live and an install cd for 3 different
platforms (x86, ppc, amd64)
I am not quite sure how vm-ware works, but there is a free player for
virtual machines available. There is also virtual machines available
for e.g. Ubuntu. Might be worth checking out that option as well.
On 3/3/06, Martin Arver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest Ubuntu as good Linux dis
I would suggest Ubuntu as good Linux distribution. As it is based on
Debian, the package system is imho incredibly good. Haven't used
Fedora, but I guess that it is a .rpm based distro which as far as I
know is not up to par with .deb. Ubuntu is also very easy to install
and is functional straight
On 3/3/06, mathew holton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I won't start arguing about Debian then. All I know is that I had
> very little linux experience (I installed Red Hat about 7 years
> ago...that's it) and I found it extremely amazing. Maybe other distro's
> are just as amazing now, compar
Well, I won't start arguing about Debian then. All I know is that I had
very little linux experience (I installed Red Hat about 7 years
ago...that's it) and I found it extremely amazing. Maybe other distro's
are just as amazing now, compared to 7 years ago. I don't know.
Dominik Riebeling wrot
On 3/3/06, mathew holton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest you install Linux (Debian is really easy) and use that. I
I wouldn't recommend Debian to anyone who is new to Linux. I consider
myself an experienced linux user and found other distributions way
more beginner-friendly.
I'd recommend F
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Frederic Devernay wrote:
I think the clean way to develop a plugin would be to be able to build it
from another directory than the rockbox build dir. Linux developpers may
think about how kernel modules can be built from any directory, making it
easier to distribute them se
I am working on a plugin in a cygwin h120 sim and I am tired of
waiting for make to find out that nothing else has changed apart from
the plugin itself.
I think the clean way to develop a plugin would be to be able to build
it from another directory than the rockbox build dir. Linux developper
I suggest you install Linux (Debian is really easy) and use that. I
started off using cygwin and found it painfully slow (on my PIII 600)
but after installing Debian, everything worked much faster and was more
enjoyable.
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, roolku wrote:
I am working
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, roolku wrote:
I am working on a plugin in a cygwin h120 sim and I am tired of waiting for
make to find out that nothing else has changed apart from the plugin itself.
The build system (and everything else) is dead slow on cygwin because the file
system/handling is extremel
I am working on a plugin in a cygwin h120 sim and I am
tired of waiting for make to find out that nothing
else has changed apart from the plugin itself. So I
just want to compile that single c file. For that
purpose I added a new target to the makefile in my
build directory like this:
helloworld:
12 matches
Mail list logo
