I still haven't seen a report of it working on a non-USB_DETECT_BY_CORE
such as nano2g. Did I miss that? Ideally I'd also like to see if
USB_DETECT_BY_CORE now magically works for those now.
Frank
I did test it on the Clip v1 bootloader without difficulties, which doesn't
use ...BY_CORE, if th
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:13:11AM -0500, Michael Sevakis wrote:
> If that patch goes in to fix FreeBSD (why isn't it commited?), it
> won't matter anyway.
I still haven't seen a report of it working on a non-USB_DETECT_BY_CORE
such as nano2g. Did I miss that? Ideally I'd also like to see if
USB_D
Almost certainly not. This looks like a bug waiting to happen to me.
Frank
If that patch goes in to fix FreeBSD (why isn't it commited?), it won't
matter anyway.
Mike
Hi,
Noticed a warning for this code in firmware/usb.c, line 557 (as of
r31578):
status = (status == USB_INSERTED) ? : USB_EXTRACTED;
According to the gcc manual (section 5.7), the expression "x ? : y" (a
gcc extension) has the value x if x is nonzero, otherwise z. So, status
is set to "
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:00:09PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Noticed a warning for this code in firmware/usb.c, line 557 (as of r31578):
>
> status = (status == USB_INSERTED) ? : USB_EXTRACTED;
>
> According to the gcc manual (section 5.7), the expression "x ? : y"
> (a gcc ext
Yes. It's just like "status = (status == USB_INSERTED) ? status :
USB_EXTRACTED;"
Hi,
Noticed a warning for this code in firmware/usb.c, line 557 (as of
r31578):
status = (status == USB_INSERTED) ? : USB_EXTRACTED;
According to the gcc manual (section 5.7), the expression "x ? : y" (a
Hi,
Noticed a warning for this code in firmware/usb.c, line 557 (as of r31578):
status = (status == USB_INSERTED) ? : USB_EXTRACTED;
According to the gcc manual (section 5.7), the expression "x ? : y" (a gcc
extension) has the value x if x is nonzero, otherwise z. So, status is set to
"tr
