[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7993

2009-11-01 Thread ajc
r7993 | ajc | 2009-11-02 00:21:58 -0500 (Mon, 02 Nov 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/citadel/modules/wiki/serv_wiki.c * did some work on the wiki history reverter

[Citadel Development] Re: Spider Monkey

2009-11-01 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>When in a single thread it doesn't use the NSPR since theres little or >nothing to worry about but in a multithreaded environment it makes use of the >NSPR for just about everything to ensure that locks and atomic operations etc >are obeyed. Even so, I'm still inclined to

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7992

2009-11-01 Thread ajc
r7992 | ajc | 2009-11-01 22:54:39 -0500 (Sun, 01 Nov 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/citadel/modules/imap/serv_imap.c * Made some annotations regarding bug 368 in the code. --

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7991

2009-11-01 Thread ajc
r7991 | ajc | 2009-11-01 22:41:19 -0500 (Sun, 01 Nov 2009) | 1 line Changed paths: M /trunk/citadel/modules/imap/serv_imap.c * removed a spurious trace msg --

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7990

2009-11-01 Thread davew
r7990 | davew | 2009-11-01 13:09:14 -0500 (Sun, 01 Nov 2009) | 8 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/citadel/Makefile.in M /trunk/citadel/citserver.c M /trunk/citadel/citserver.h A /trunk/citadel/context.c A /trunk/ci

[Citadel Development] Re: Spider Monkey

2009-11-01 Thread davew
  > Sat Oct 31 2009 03:56:12 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored >Subject: Re: Spider Monkey > >It uses it for everything, but it's optional for a single-threaded >parser? >How's that? > >Are there any other JS parsers out there that we should be looking at? >Perhaps the KDE

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7989

2009-11-01 Thread davew
  Try not to use the server from this commit. I broke the DOWN command and the server just crashes and restarts if you issue it a DOWN. Signals still work though. A fix for this is comming.  

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7989

2009-11-01 Thread davew
  > Sun Nov 01 2009 03:35:31 AM EST from dothebart @ Uncensored Subject: >Citadel commit log: revision 7989 > > > >dave, exactly that was the condition, a badly designed part would chew up >100% cpu. > >entering it from several threads, it would just distribute the CPU amongs >several t

[Citadel Development] Citadel commit log: revision 7989

2009-11-01 Thread dothebart
dave, exactly that was the condition, a badly designed part would chew up 100% cpu. entering it from several threads, it would just distribute the CPU amongs several threads. a modern linux system can cope with that, and is staying responsive. New jobs inside of citserver just will gain their fai