Push to the project "citadel.org ": The branch, master has been updated
via 2993a1dc1eb0a043c3ebeff83cf6f9cfad8adb93 (commit)
from a629da83391d58813cc962f6c52d991868b10e3a (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have not appeared
on any other notifica
>IG, could you have a look at this? why does the mentioned pointer
>contain invalid data instead of NULL? could you clean that up?
Which pointer are we talking about here?
>is it right we reply with FETCH on a uid store request?
In that case, yes. When you STORE flags, it generates an implicit FETCH
that tells you the new state.
Sun Nov 14 2010 17:16:49 EST from "dothebart" Subject: [SCM] citadel.org branch, master, updated. a629da83391d58813cc962f6c52d991868b10e3a
http://code.citadel.org/cgit.cgi/git.citadel.org/commit/?id=1bca8e52ac5e6713c26867195fffed2e49861f0e commit 1bca8e52ac5e6713c26867195fffed2e49861f0e Aut
Push to the project "citadel.org ": The branch, master has been updated
via a629da83391d58813cc962f6c52d991868b10e3a (commit)
via 0b543f0266b19d4654406dc00f652bed445f624c (commit)
via 1bca8e52ac5e6713c26867195fffed2e49861f0e (commit)
via 4e12c13641546283c6820ef432e0
ok, with newer libc's overlapping memcpys will fail:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha/15278
I'm pretty shure we had some of them, now they might fall on our feet.
