[Citadel Development] (no subject)

2012-07-31 Thread dothebart
IG, if you _change_ an enum / define in libcitadel you have to increase the library version number.  

[Citadel Development] (no subject)

2012-07-31 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
That's kind of what I was getting at. By default it would use the "Domain Admins" group to determine who gets admin level access, but if someone wants to change it to a custom group name such as "Citadel Admins" they could do so. The only snag I can see with that is if they get something like

[Citadel Development] (no subject)

2012-07-31 Thread Spell Binder
Or allow the Citadel admin to specify a custom group name to be used to define the administrators. Stupid question about AD and LDAP. How are the logon name, first & last name, and display name being encoded? Are they not distinct fields in the LDAP response?

[Citadel Development] Re: Administrator login when using Active Directory

2012-07-31 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Yes, I do see the problem. Now we have to find an elegant way to address it. The concept of "name your admin" doesn't seem to fit well with LDAP. Perhaps we should go with the group thing. Perhaps if the authentication mode is AD then we should skip that entirely and simply use group membership