[Citadel Development] Re: Progress?

2017-05-09 Thread bennabiy
I guess I mean in it all, wouldn't it be better to get an actual instance up, where we can make sure it works how we want, before we worry about how to get from state a to b (like what you are doing with webcit-ng) > Tue May 09 2017 03:56:48 PM EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored Subject: Re: >Progr

[Citadel Development] Re: Progress?

2017-05-09 Thread bennabiy
Agreed on the timing thing. As long as we are keeping that in mind, that is "Good Enough For Now"...    Can you possibly make a version which does not "upgrade" per se, and just starts with the correct data structure, and I could import the data into it for testing through imapcopy or the lik

[Citadel Development] Re: Progress?

2017-05-09 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Changing the table format is the easy part.  The time consuming part is writing the code to convert the old data format, add it to export/import, etc.  So it'll take a bit of time.  But I think it's worth it to get rid of a piece of the data model I've never liked too much. I have some thoughts a

[Citadel Development] Re: Progress?

2017-05-09 Thread bennabiy
Yes, I cannot see it working the way we would like without a couple new tables (unless you want to be looking at it a couple years down the road wondering why all the mess and hackwork...) Those tables are not going to be *too* large though, just one more thing to export. Also, would it be the t

[Citadel Development] Re: Progress?

2017-05-09 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Still bellyaching over where we're going to put all this data. I do think it's going to require some new tables.