[Citadel Development] Re: Change in Citadel

2014-03-20 Thread bennabiy
I think the thing I am most concerned with is losing private communication from citadel to citadel, for the sake of sending mail only between two servers, with the same LDAP users on both servers.   If I could set up two servers which share the same data store so that they have a common mailbox a

[Citadel Development] Re: Change in Citadel

2014-03-19 Thread bennabiy
I think the thing I am most concerned with is losing private communication from citadel to citadel, for the sake of sending mail only between two servers, with the same LDAP users on both servers.   If I could set up two servers which share the same data store so that they have a common mailbox a

[Citadel Development] Re: Change in Citadel

2014-03-17 Thread harryc
Why not create your own certificate authority, have that issue certificates to the citadel servers you prefer, then turn off all non-secure smtp addresses, and delete references to the other certificate authorities.   Then citadel should only accept to transfer email from the authorized domains. 

[Citadel Development] Re: Change in Citadel

2014-03-17 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
Sounds like we'll be making this transition over the course of a couple of releases so we can feel out everyone's needs. I like hearing about what you're doing with the Citadel system; it's very interesting.

[Citadel Development] Re: Change in Citadel

2014-03-17 Thread bennabiy
Thank you for including me here. Probably our use case goes against the grain of the normal trend in email clients. We have a large international presence in many countries, and are not interested in communications with anyone outside our organization (through citadel). We have run our own mail s