I approve of anything that we will stick to. A six month cycle sounds good.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Olaf Siejka wrote:
> I think its a good time to discuss current development cycle.
> It become clear to me, that there is no way we can currently adhere to 3
> months development cycle. I
I think its a good time to discuss current development cycle.
It become clear to me, that there is no way we can currently adhere to 3
months development cycle. Its pointless to stick to something we managed to
succeed only once or twice.
Agreeing with the fact we do need releases, for various reas
http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5664
The patch has been bugreported for testing/review. I`m trying some apps
under it on Vbox, and so far they are working fine or better than fine. I
dont see windows lockup when switching tabs on cpu-z anymore.
Regards
2010/10/9 James Tabor
> H
