It should be fixed with the latest revision. If you still experience any
problems, let me know.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Hello,
Why everyone else had been complaining on how we should revert changes that
expose compiler bugs, I, on the other hand, have not even been able to build
ReactOS anymore starting with recent revisions (probably related to C++
changes).
Anyone want to fix this, please?
[PCH] obj-i38
Yep, sorry, a 'C' lost in cyberspace. *ROSPPC
/Jaix
> Am 23.11.2010 09:27, schrieb Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo:
> > errr... "ROSPP"??
> >
>
> From the context I'd guess ReactOS PowerPC
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
> ___
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@r
also...
which will be the minimum hardware requirements for ARM port?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 23.11.2010 09:27, schrieb Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo:
>
>> errr... "ROSPP"??
>>
>>
> From the context I'd guess ReactOS PowerPC
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
>
>
Am 23.11.2010 09:27, schrieb Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo:
errr... "ROSPP"??
From the context I'd guess ReactOS PowerPC
Regards,
Sven
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
errr... "ROSPP"??
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Jan Blomqvist Kinander <
jan.blomqv...@reactos.org> wrote:
> Wow, cool, looking forward to see your future progress, it is inspiring to
> read the SVN messages of all progress.
>
> I have looked forward to see this last kind of pictures and clips
Wow, cool, looking forward to see your future progress, it is inspiring to read
the SVN messages of all progress.
I have looked forward to see this last kind of pictures and clips of the
ARM-bringup effort.
It will be nice to see the same for ROS64 and others like ROSPP when time is
ripe.
Ke
