Hi Olaf,
I am already investigating the services test issues. One of my first
findings is that the current widl seems to mess up value ranges in some
cases. This is the cause of the following errors:
err:(dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c:6496) value exceeded bounds: 918,
low: 0, high: 514
I
@Eric
http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579
http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not
inherently broken.
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03 +0200, "Pierre Schweitzer"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> finally.
> Colin and I
Hi,
finally.
Colin and I are pleased to announce you that ReactOS Linux KVM tests are back
online and working. You can find the first tests results (on r53383) sent
tonight by the testbot on testman: http://www.reactos.org/testman/.
Regards,
Pierre.
ReactOS Development List wrote on Sat, Augu
Since the decision has been taken not to have the meeting public due to the
topics that will be discussed, only the people who are in the quoted list will
be able to access to the channel on the IRC server where the meeting will be
held.
To those who are on the list and who may not have receive
A correction, today's meeting is NOT open to public viewing.
2011/8/25 Jérôme Gardou
> Hi.
>
> I won't be able to attend the meeting tonight. As for the votings, Amine
> knows my feelings about the two issues concerned, so I give him my vote, if
> such a thing is doable.
>
> Regards.
> Jérôme.
>
Hi.
I won't be able to attend the meeting tonight. As for the votings, Amine
knows my feelings about the two issues concerned, so I give him my vote,
if such a thing is doable.
Regards.
Jérôme.
Le 25/08/2011 18:14, Pierre Schweitzer a écrit :
Hi,
I've just sent the emails containing the cre
Hi,
I've just sent the emails containing the credentials to all the users.
As a public reminder, the meeting will take place on the IRC server
fezile.reactos.org port 6667, no SSL) on channel #meeting.
Please don't forget to log in with the given nickname and then provide the
password you recei
Aleksey Bragin wrote:
> As for public/private, I suppose majority wanted to have it private?
> I don't have a strong position here because first of all we are
> not going to discuss something, which is not for public ear,
Why do you say that?
What if I think Timo is actually an American spy ou
I will this time.
As for public/private, I suppose majority wanted to have it private?
I don't have a strong position here because first of all we are not
going to discuss something, which is not for public ear, and second
is that meeting minutes are published anyway in our mailing list. If
