On January 19, 2012 at 3:38 AM Zachary Gorden drakekaizer...@gmail.com
wrote:
end-users because THEY themselves do not consider it to be necessary.
The source code may be there, but if you can't get the changes you
It's not perfect, but it's working. It's hard to argue with success.
The
On 19.01.2012 15:03, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
On January 19, 2012 at 3:38 AM Zachary Gordendrakekaizer...@gmail.com
wrote:
end-users because THEY themselves do not consider it to be necessary.
The source code may be there, but if you can't get the changes you
It's not perfect, but it's
On January 19, 2012 at 12:06 PM Aleksey Bragin alek...@reactos.org wrote:
On 19.01.2012 15:03, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
It's not perfect, but it's working. It's hard to argue with success.
The day Linux is not good enough, it will be left behind for something
else.
//Jakob
On January 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote:
Quote L. T.: I don't think kernel development should be easy. I do
not condone single-stepping through code to find the bug. I do not think
that extra visibility into the system is
necessarily a good thing.
/o\
