Shouldn't member variables rather be prefixed with m_?
Am 05.10.2012 01:46, schrieb tfa...@svn.reactos.org:
Author: tfaber
Date: Thu Oct 4 23:46:59 2012
New Revision: 57485
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=57485&view=rev
Log:
[SHELL32]
- Fix what might finally be the last missing
Yeah, that would certainly be a more sensible convention.
I wasn't planning on refactoring all of shell32 any time soon though. :|
We accept patches™ ;)
On 2012-10-05 10:30, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
> Shouldn't member variables rather be prefixed with m_?
>
>
> Am 05.10.2012 01:46, schrieb tfa...@s
Isn't there somewhere some compiler warning for such ambiguation?
Le Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:41:47 +0200,
Thomas Faber a écrit :
> Yeah, that would certainly be a more sensible convention.
> I wasn't planning on refactoring all of shell32 any time soon
> though. :|
>
> We accept patches™ ;)
>
>
>
> Isn't there somewhere some compiler warning for such ambiguation?
Clang has an option "-Wself-assign" which should warn about it.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev