it might fix an assert but the patch is incorrect. will this also take 6
months to revert?
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:19 AM, wrote:
> Author: jgardou
> Date: Tue Feb 17 14:19:05 2015
> New Revision: 66334
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=66334&view=rev
>
Hi Colin,
I will have a look at sysreg2.
Please make sure that the NUC is setup with the latest LTS. It will make
the process smoother.
Cheers,
Pierre
On 18/02/2015 11:17, Colin Finck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As tests have shown that VirtualBox doesn't work properly inside an
> already virtualized
Hi all,
As tests have shown that VirtualBox doesn't work properly inside an
already virtualized environment, ReactOS Deutschland e.V. has just
ordered a tiny Intel NUC that will serve as a VirtualBox Testslave. We
plan to set it up right next to our Buildslaves, so that every ISO could
possibly be
On 2015-02-16 11:19, Jérôme Gardou wrote:
>> However I don't see a practical way to implement your solution. For one,
>> the timeout seems like it would have to cause a machine reboot, which
>> significantly increases test time. I guess rosautotest could keep track
>> of the time and kill the child
I don't really see what we could be doing wrong here. We're not
responsible for the data an application passes to us.
If we're not capable of correctly giving back the tuple (width,height,
bpp) which permits to calculate the buffer size, we'd better stop
everything and start thinking about raising
Is this a bug in Office 2007 or are we doing something wrong here?
Am 17.02.2015 um 21:41 schrieb jgar...@svn.reactos.org:
Author: jgardou
Date: Tue Feb 17 20:41:51 2015
New Revision: 66342
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=66342&view=rev
Log:
[WIN32SS/NTGDI]
- Reject bits data ea
