I agree 100%. A combination of the Shim Engine, MinWin/API Sets and
Fusion/SxS would help us achieve these goals while at the same time
implementing key missing Windows features we don't yet have.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Timo Kreuzer timo.kreu...@web.de wrote:
Am 07.03.2015 um 16:44 schrieb Pierre Schweitzer:
Hi,
There's one point I don't see any reference to: you keep talking about
DLLs such. How would you handle API in these DLLs that require system
calls from kernel? Does that mean our kernel has to evolve to something
higher than 5.2?
At some
I fully second Alex.
Concerning point 1 of Timo’s ideas, I was also thinking about making some kind
of wizard in which you say which exe you want to run, and choose in some lists
the compatibility features.
Cheers,
Hermès.
De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] De la part
Hi,
There's one point I don't see any reference to: you keep talking about
DLLs such. How would you handle API in these DLLs that require system
calls from kernel? Does that mean our kernel has to evolve to something
higher than 5.2?
Another (minor) point: you talk about parent DLLs that would
Looking at the activity of this ML, one could think ros developers are
done hibernating for this year :-)
Le 07/03/2015 16:44, Pierre Schweitzer a écrit :
Hi,
There's one point I don't see any reference to: you keep talking about
DLLs such. How would you handle API in these DLLs that require
Hi,
Here's the promised suggestion regarding how we handle versioning
problems in reactos. It has some relationship to the tree restructure.
Since some time we now run into issues with our targeted Windows
version. This is both wine dlls, as well as applications that refuse to
run due to
Le 07/03/2015 22:21, Timo Kreuzer a écrit :
Am 07.03.2015 um 20:04 schrieb Colin Finck:
Am 07.03.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Timo Kreuzer:
The file system
redirection would redirect system32 into merged folders, containing the
version specific DLLs, while everything that is not existing in this
Hmm I may be completely mistaken but doesn''t Windows use the ActCtx stuff
for compatibility profiles? Wouldn't we be able to use
forward-compatibility profiles? If that's right, it may be the cleanest
system for it.
On 7 March 2015 at 22:38, Jerome Gardou jerome.gar...@reactos.org wrote:
Le
