Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [pschweitzer] 66101: [CDMAKE] It's totally pointless to nullify after calloc

2015-01-28 Thread Pierre Schweitzer
It wasn't intended. Then, if you want to rethink the usage of calloc and/or redundant code, feel free. On 29/01/2015 00:03, Timo Kreuzer wrote: This code change doesn't help to make the code more readable. Am 28.01.2015 um 21:41 schrieb pschweit...@svn.reactos.org: Author: pschweitzer

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [pschweitzer] 66101: [CDMAKE] It's totally pointless to nullify after calloc

2015-01-28 Thread Timo Kreuzer
This code change doesn't help to make the code more readable. Am 28.01.2015 um 21:41 schrieb pschweit...@svn.reactos.org: Author: pschweitzer Date: Wed Jan 28 20:41:23 2015 New Revision: 66101 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=66101view=rev Log: [CDMAKE] It's totally pointless to