O also.if you actually have a look at http://iso.reactos.org/
livecd(no cab) vs bootcd(cab) size you will notice the livecd is
smaller. This is due to 7z compression. So i don't think this should
be an issue. It will only be bigger in size when as a plain iso file
though.
Though of course includin
There are a few things I want to change. The textmode installer uses
windows dll's that are identical to the livecd ones. Though they are
stored in different locations for example ntoskrnl.exe is in reactos
on bootcd and reactos/system32 on livecd. Also currently the textmode
installer just replace
Andrew Green wrote:
I was wondering what peoples preferred methods would be.
Put the files to be installed into a single CAB file (ReactOS style),
multiple CAB files (NT5 style) or some other container (NT6 style), but
don't just use the system files the Live-CD needs to run.
ROS shall be ins
The most obvious impact i see is that iso.reactos.org will be able to hold
less revisions. Same thing with storage for my Windows-based builds.
2011/3/28 Andrew Green
> I have been thinking about what will be needed for my gsoc proposal.
>
> Merging the live cd and install cd of React OS is one
I have been thinking about what will be needed for my gsoc proposal.
Merging the live cd and install cd of React OS is one of the goals.
Though the file structure is different on the install and live cd.
The install cd has all the React OS files in a cab file. While live cd
has everything in a fo
