[RDBO] good news - SF adding SVN support

2005-12-22 Thread Darren Duncan
Following the brief talk we had at the dawn of this mailing list, or the day after, on Sept 8th, of subject "Anon CVS is up", ... I am pleased to say that SourceForge will be adding SVN server support soon, and so Rose can use it instead of CVS, as I suggested. This update was according to a

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/22/05 10:41 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: >> Hrm. Any more opinions or ideas? Is there a happy medium? > > The happy medium would probably be: > get_objects_array() > > It allows the foreach and returns only one (like Perrin said). Well, it should really be "_list". Maybe I'll just add a conte

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread Uwe Voelker
> Hrm. Any more opinions or ideas? Is there a happy medium? The happy medium would probably be: get_objects_array() It allows the foreach and returns only one (like Perrin said). Uwe --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do yo

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/22/05 10:14 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: >> The docs are wrong, but I've changed my mind on this a few times. Opinions? > > I hate wantarray. It's a constant source of bugs and makes testing more > complicated. I prefer methods that consistently return the same thing. > > As an example, I'v

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/22/05 10:21 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: > Just a quick look at the contents of the RDBO object. Especially > DateTime columns are so huge when dumped. Ah, I see. There's nothing built-in, but you could probably write your own dumper thingie by just iterating over the columns and printing their v

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 09:54 -0500, John Siracusa wrote: > On 12/22/05 10:04 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: > > Manager's get_objects unconditionally returns "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", whereas > > the > > doc says it respects list context (and I vague remember it did some > > releases ago). > > The docs are wro

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread Uwe Voelker
>>Manager's get_objects unconditionally returns "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", whereas the >>doc says it respects list context (and I vague remember it did some >>releases ago). > > The docs are wrong, but I've changed my mind on this a few times. Opinions? The wantarray() doesn't hurt. Give it the flexi

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread Svilen Ivanov
On Thursday 22 December 2005 16:54, John Siracusa wrote: > On 12/22/05 10:04 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: > > Manager's get_objects unconditionally returns "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", whereas > > the > > doc says it respects list context (and I vague remember it did some > > releases ago). > > The docs are wro

Re: [RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/22/05 10:04 AM, Uwe Voelker wrote: > Manager's get_objects unconditionally returns "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", whereas the > doc says it respects list context (and I vague remember it did some > releases ago). The docs are wrong, but I've changed my mind on this a few times. Opinions? > Also, is

[RDBO] RDBO::Manager->get_objects in list context

2005-12-22 Thread Uwe Voelker
Hello John, Manager's get_objects unconditionally returns "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", whereas the doc says it respects list context (and I vague remember it did some releases ago). Also, is there a nicer debugging output (I mean compared to "print Dumper($object)")? Thanks, bye, Uwe ---