On 6/7/06 12:08 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
>> I do intend to work with subqueries and am thinking about how to incorporate
>> them or else cheat with some post-processing.
>
> You may have to cheat for now since QueryBuilder has no support for
> subqueries (other than as liter SQL clauses)
Er, make
On 6/6/06 10:49 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> According to the docs, 'COLUMN' => { in_set => 'A' } generates the SQL
> "A IN COLUMN". This seems like the reverse of normal usage, e.g. "name
> IN ('john','paul')". Can anyone explain what this might be used for?
It's used for the SET column type sup
John Siracusa wrote:
>On 6/6/06, Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Any other key things I should note? Also, will the speed advantage of
>>RDBO be maintained, or are both such young modules that it's hard to say
>>where the speed advantage will end up?
>>
>>
>
>The speed advantage
Hi,
I'm looking at using Rose::DB::Object::QueryBuilder on its own (without
the rest of RDBO) to generate some SQL. It looks like this should work
fine. However, I'm finding the in_set and in_array methods very confusing.
According to the docs, 'COLUMN' => { in_set => 'A' } generates the SQL
On 6/6/06, Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to understand what the differences are and which
> are relevant for my environment. So far, this is what I've picked up
> (yes a bit slim):
>
> 1. RDBO is faster.
> 2. DBIC has a Class::DBI compatibility layer that will make the
> tran
Hello,
Last summer, I started developing new applications using Class::DBI
rather than my own home grown DBI modules.
A few weeks ago, I saw a reference on the mod_perl list to the benchmark
page:
http://rose.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/RDBO/Benchmark
Rather than sticking with Class::DBI, I
John Siracusa wrote:
> If related objects are fetched by the Manager due to require_objects
> or with_objects parameters, they should be attached as full-fledged
> objects. Can you can show me an instance (sample code) where this is
> not the case?
That's good to know; I was making something of
Hi.
Has anybody out there ever tried passing Rose::DB::Object subclass
instances into a Safe compartment? This is almost certainly an issue
specific to Safe and not specific to the Rose:: family in general,
though I think the Rose::DB::Object internals are "late-binding" with
sufficient frequ
