On 9/27/06 8:03 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> 2) migrate all the involved tables to have helper classes which
> contain the user defined functions, then inherit as needed
I'd go with that approach. You might want to take a look at
Rose::DB::Object::MixIn, which is what Rose::DB::Object::Helper is
I'm refactoring some constantly hit code... migrating some multi-
object selects to a VIEW in sql + rose class -- and
The plan is such:
migrate some multi-table conditional joins into views, with
VIEW__##NAME## Rose DB classes
cache the views into memcached, using storable or
On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:16 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> I tried not to use too many SQLish words in the Manager API because
> so few
> features directly control SQL. IOW, the vocabulary of the API
> tries not to
> be identical to that of SQL because the functionality of the API is
> quite
> abs
On 9/27/06, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm just wondering why its sort_by and not order_by-- is it just a
> perlish/sqlish naming thing?
I tried not to use too many SQLish words in the Manager API because so few
features directly control SQL. IOW, the vocabulary of the API trie
i'm just wondering why its sort_by and not order_by-- is it just a
perlish/sqlish naming thing?
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y
