I just realized I am doing things backwards. Please disregard my problem.
-Bryan
Bryan Opfer wrote:
> I am trying to set up a system where I can use use
> Rose::DB::Object::Loader to auto make my modules any time I make a
> schema change. Then I can have manually created classes that use the
Opps, I had a typo in the base for My::Foo. It would look like this:
package My::Foo;
use strict;
use base qw(My::DB::Foo);
# class and instance methods here...
1;
Bryan Opfer wrote:
> I am trying to set up a system where I can use use
> Rose::DB::Object::Loader to auto make my modules
I am trying to set up a system where I can use use
Rose::DB::Object::Loader to auto make my modules any time I make a
schema change. Then I can have manually created classes that use the
auto-generated classes as their base. But, I am running into a problem
with the relationships.
Here is a
On Feb 9, 2007, at 9:49 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> This is a fine idea, but I think the correct approach is to make a new
> Manager class that uses the existing Manager class internally. That's
> a lot cleaner than trying to further augment the existing Manager.
This was ridiculously easy to im
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 23:16:24 -0500 Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JV> I've been doing a lot of repetitive operations on the results from
JV> manager functions lately.
JV> Today I think I realized a functionality that might make sense -- if
JV> the results returned by a manager ca
On 2/8/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I think I realized a functionality that might make sense -- if
> the results returned by a manager call weren't simply an array, but a
> class object.
>
> It would behave just as an array - there would be no real difference
> in current
On 2/8/07, Ask Bjørn Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2/8/07, Michael Reece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i see that i can define the column as
>>
>>saved_on => { type => 'datetime', time_zone => 'America/New_York' }
>>
>> and get the right datetime value, but is there an easy way to
>> in
