On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:54:36PM -0400, John Siracusa wrote:
> > What about using Ima::DBI? Would that stomp on RDB?
>
> I doubt it. A Rose::DB object shouldn't care much what class its dbh is, so
> long as it acts appropriately like a plain DBI dbh.
Sorry, just getting back to this.
I'm mis
On Apr 18, 2007, at 11:58 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
>
> Well, lemme implement it and you can try it and tell me how it works
> for you. I'll try to get it done this week.
fair enough :)
I should have the object_tree stuff done by friday/monday.
I had to put this stuff off for a few days to deal
On 4/18/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:22 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
>> On 4/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Though that can be handled using a strip helper alone too -- we'd just need
>>> an unstrip() function that builds back in a db
On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:22 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Though that can be handled using a strip helper alone too -- we'd
>> just need an unstrip() function that builds back in a db object and
>> metadata
>
> I don't think that'd be necessar
On 4/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though that can be handled using a strip helper alone too -- we'd
> just need an unstrip() function that builds back in a db object and
> metadata
I don't think that'd be necessary. The meta and db attributes would
re-materialize on demand
