On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:16 AM, David Lloyd wrote:
>
> Is it possible to have separate read and write database connections in
> Rose::DB::Object?
>
> For example, I might have read to:
>
> read.db.com
>
> ...and...write to:
>
> write.db.com
>
> ...is it possible to get any updates/deletes and i
On Jun 24, 2007, at 7:32 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On 6/24/07 5:53 PM, James Masters wrote:
>> The second is that I also need to sort on one of these fields.
>> This doesn't
>> seem to happen I think because Rose delegates sorting to SQL and,
>> of course,
>> SQL doesn't know about the fiel
On 6/24/07 5:53 PM, James Masters wrote:
>>> Does Rose facilitate such "display-only" fields in some way?
>> write a function in the rose class
>
> Thanks. I've got this working but have hit 2 probs. The first is that my
> classes are automatically generated and adding the functions to the E
> > Does Rose facilitate such "display-only" fields in some way?
>
> write a function in the rose class
Thanks. I've got this working but have hit 2 probs. The first is that my
classes are automatically generated and adding the functions to the Extra.pm
doesn't work. However, this is not a
After just over a year of development and testing, I'm pleased to
finally announce the 1.0 release of Handel. The 1.0 release has
undergone a major rewrite from the 0.3x series of releases and includes
many new features and fixes. The new features include:
DBIx::Class Support
Handel now uses DBI
