On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
Hi John
> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
You mean like SQL::Abstract?
http://search.cpan.org/~nwiger/SQL-Abstract-1.22/
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
-
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time to
dedicate to it.
Something like:
my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager->getSelect();
$query->someField->setCond
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:29 PM, maxim wrote:
> It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
Yeah, no kidding :) I've got ideas for one but so far not enough time
to dedicate to it.
> Something like:
>
> my $query = Rose::DB::TableName::Manager->getSelect();
> $query->someField
Hi John,
It would be nice to have abstraction layer for SQL query itself.
I've seen that you have QueryBuilder class but its not really cohesive
with Rose::DB::Object paradigm. What I am looking for is row based object
which
knows about allowed fields and operations and therefore can be passed to
