Re: [RDBO] RDBO and computed columns

2008-02-05 Thread John Siracusa
On Feb 5, 2008 5:16 PM, Grzegorz Nosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I might be missing something, but inside the > sql_qualify_columns_on_load method you're using $_[1] after shifting > $self off the argument array, so to set the value to true, I must pass > two arguments to the method Too sl

Re: [RDBO] RDBO and computed columns

2008-02-05 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
Hi, On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:18:28PM -0500, John Siracusa wrote: > On Feb 5, 2008 4:06 PM, Grzegorz Nosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > t/db-objectok 1/566# Looks like you planned 566 > > tests but only ran 562. > > Whoops, that should be fixed now. Yup, it is. You're

Re: [RDBO] RDBO and computed columns

2008-02-05 Thread John Siracusa
On Feb 5, 2008 4:06 PM, Grzegorz Nosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > t/db-objectok 1/566# Looks like you planned 566 > tests but only ran 562. Whoops, that should be fixed now. > sql_qualify_columns_on_load is on by default. Actually, it looks > hardcoded to one ($self->{..

Re: [RDBO] RDBO and computed columns

2008-02-05 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:37:11PM -0500, John Siracusa wrote: > On Feb 4, 2008 3:51 PM, Grzegorz Nosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Test case attached. It's weird. Help! ;) > > Not so weird: it was a simple bug in the boolean method maker. It's > fixed in SVN now. I'll work on the column name

Re: [RDBO] ANNOUNCE: Rose::DB::Object 0.7663 released

2008-02-05 Thread John Siracusa
On Feb 5, 2008 3:25 AM, Michael Lackhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get this test failure with 0.7663: Yeah, there's a bad skip count in one of the tests. I've revoked 0.7663. Expect 0.7664 soon(ish) :) -John - This SF

Re: [RDBO] ANNOUNCE: Rose::DB::Object 0.7663 released

2008-02-05 Thread Michael Lackhoff
On 04.02.2008 21:41 John Siracusa wrote: > More bug fixes that I didn't want to wait until the next major release. I get this test failure with 0.7663: Test Summary Report --- t/db-object-loader-8.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 19 Failed: 16) Failed test number(s): 4-19